Resuming an inquest (or not) after a homicide trial

R(Bailey) v HM Senior Coroner for East London [2025] EWHC 1637 (Admin) 30 June 2025 (judgment here) Once the investigative obligation under Article 2 ECHR is engaged an inquest will most often be the means by which the state will satisfy the procedural obligations that follow. However in situations where the inquest has been suspended […]

Read More… from Resuming an inquest (or not) after a homicide trial

Sharing skeleton arguments and written submissions at inquests

R (Metropolitan Police Commissioner) v Police Conduct Panel [2025] EWHC 1462 (Admin)  17 June 2025,  judgment here Skeleton arguments and written submissions are often emailed to coroners in advance of an inquest or PIRH.  The document is rarely read out in court in full, and so any press or public sitting in court may find […]

Read More… from Sharing skeleton arguments and written submissions at inquests

Making matters worse: the scope of police responsibility for a death

Tindall and another v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2024] UKSC 33, (judgment here) It is not coronial law under the microscope here, but rather a decision from the Supreme Court at the end of last year in a police civil action.  Nevertheless it provides helpful insight into the potential responsibility of police forces […]

Read More… from Making matters worse: the scope of police responsibility for a death

International Conference on Assisted Dying & Gambling Deaths

The Centre for Contemporary Coronial Law – International Conference On Wednesday, 11th June 2025 the Centre for Contemporary Coronial Law  conference will have three international speakers on Assisted Dying, from Canada, Holland and Victoria in Australia. Professor Udo Schuklenk (Queen’s University, Canada) Nicola Farray (Department of Health & Human Services, Victoria, Australia) Dr Cécile Woudenberg-van […]

Read More… from International Conference on Assisted Dying & Gambling Deaths