R (Skelton) v Senior Coroner for West Sussex and the Chief Constable of Sussex Police & Robert Trigg (interested parties) [2020] EWHC 2813 (Admin) Determining whether Art 2 procedural obligations are engaged at an inquest can be one of the most challenging legal questions in the coronial jurisdiction. The issue for a coroner is not […]
R (Skelton) v Senior Coroner for West Sussex and the Chief Constable of Sussex Police & Robert Trigg (interested parties) [2020] EWHC 2813 (Admin) Whilst many will be unsurprised to be told that a fresh inquest cannot reach a verdict inconsistent with an earlier homicide conviction, it is nevertheless reassuring to learn that a statutory […]
Read More… from Impermissible to challenge a criminal conviction at a fresh inquest
Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service v Veevers [2020] EWHC 2550 (Comm) Can a family’s inquest costs be recovered in a subsequent civil claim if an admission has been made prior to the inquest? If the admission has in fact been informal or equivocal, the answer may well be yes. The background This claim arose […]
Read More… from An equivocal admission pre-inquest will not prevent costs being recovered
Chief Coroner’s Guidance No. 37, 28.4.2020 The Chief Coroner has today released his further guidance to coroners during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Chief Coroner sets out when a report to a coroner must be made and when an inquest will and will not be required into a death from what is a naturally occurring disease. He […]
Read More… from Covid-19 Deaths and Possible Exposure in The Workplace: The Coroner’s Role
R (Carole Smith) v HM Assistant Coroner for North West Wales [2020] EWHC 781 (Admin) The High Court has emphatically supported a Coroner’s decision not to record admitted, non-causative failings in an Article 2 inquest conclusion. The court’s observations about the proper content of a Record of Inquest (ROI) will be thought-provoking for all Coroners […]
Read More… from Admitted failings in Article 2 inquests needn’t be part of the Coroner’s conclusion