Managing tricky inquest applications: Anonymity, bad character and propensity evidence

Procedural Notes from the Birmingham Pub Bombings and Deepcut Inquests We all like a free helping hand, and so at the UKIL Blog we are happy to be able to share with the blogosphere the recent wisdom of two ‘Judge Coroners’ who have drawn up route maps to determining complicated procedural issues arising in their […]

Read More… from Managing tricky inquest applications: Anonymity, bad character and propensity evidence

“Flagrant disregard for the inquest and its processes” – fines, prosecution and double jeopardy

R v Lawrence [2019] Wimbledon Magistrates Court The unprecedented tale of “Dr.” Duncan Lawrence and his withholding of information from a coroner about his involvement in the death of the teenager Sophie Bennett has already gripped the headlines. This highly unusual criminal prosecution of a healthcare staff member who failed to give evidence at an […]

Read More… from “Flagrant disregard for the inquest and its processes” – fines, prosecution and double jeopardy

Probably suicide, but undoubtedly unlawful killing (at least for now)

R (Maughan) v Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire, the Chief Coroner as intervenor (and INQUEST as an interested party) [2019] EWCA Civ 809, 10.5.2019 After the seismic shift that followed Maughan in the Divisional Court it was remarkable that no one seemed to be predicting any aftershocks when the Court of Appeal considered the case. After […]

Read More… from Probably suicide, but undoubtedly unlawful killing (at least for now)